AI Humanizer Benchmark
Ranked #3 best AI humanizer· Oct 2026

GPTinf

AI humanizer · gptinf.com

In the October 2026 cycle, GPTinf placed #3 of 11 with an overall score of 80.74/100. AI Humanizer Benchmark tests GPTinf independently. The overall score weights bypass rate at 42%, meaning preservation at 32%, readability at 16% and consistency across categories at 10%, then subtracts any penalties.

80.74/100
overall score
88.7%
bypass rate
33/33
tests completed
0.97×
avg. length vs. input
Last tested
Sample size
33
Methodology
v1.1.0

Detector bypass rates

Average human-likelihood each detector gave this tool's outputs, shown as a percentage.

Originality.ai
92.2
Winston AI
89.1
Grammarly
88.4
QuillBot
86.4
ZeroGPT
84.5
Copyleaks
57.6
GPTZero
55.1

Performance by category

The overall-score formula applied within each category, before penalties.

Academic essayApplication essayBlog postBusiness emailMarketing copyDiscussion boardNews article

Output quality

Meaning preservation is the rescaled embedding cosine similarity between input and output. Readability is a language model's rating of clarity, fluency and naturalness. Consistency shows how evenly bypass results hold across writing categories. The published data lists each value for every test.

Meaning
68.3/100
#7 of 11 · field avg 70.6
Readability
77.7/100
#4 of 11 · field avg 75.5
Consistency
92.1/100
#6 of 11 · field avg 89.6

No quality penalties this cycle. No meaning drift, length problems, refusals or unchanged outputs in any test.

Evidence: every GPTinf run

Each row is one October 2026 prompt that GPTinf rewrote, with a dot for each of the 7 detectors. Green means the detector judged the rewrite human. Red means it scored the rewrite as AI. An empty circle means no score came back.

Download all 33 rows (.jsonl)

12 of 33 outputs passed all 7 detectors. The other 21 got an AI verdict from at least one detector or are missing a score.

#PromptInput modelGPTZeroWinston AIOriginality.aiZeroGPTGrammarlyQuillBotCopyleaksMedian
01Argumentative essayAcademic essayGemini 2.5 Flash1.00
02Lit reviewAcademic essayClaude Sonnet 51.00
03Cover letterApplication essayGPT-5.6 Luna0.92
04Personal statementApplication essayGemini 3.5 Flash1.00
05How-to blogBlog postClaude Haiku 4.51.00
06Listicle blogBlog postGPT-5.6 Terra0.76
07Business emailBusiness emailGemini 2.5 Flash0.95
08Landing copyMarketing copyClaude Sonnet 50.99
09Product descriptionMarketing copyGPT-5.6 Luna0.99
10Discussion postDiscussion boardGemini 3.5 Flash1.00
11News articleNews articleClaude Haiku 4.50.70
12Argumentative essayAcademic essayGPT-5.6 Terra1.00
13Lit reviewAcademic essayGemini 2.5 Flash1.00
14Cover letterApplication essayClaude Sonnet 50.85
15Personal statementApplication essayGPT-5.6 Luna1.00
16How-to blogBlog postGemini 3.5 Flash0.79
17Listicle blogBlog postClaude Haiku 4.50.39
18Business emailBusiness emailGPT-5.6 Terra0.69
19Landing copyMarketing copyGemini 2.5 Flash0.42
20Product descriptionMarketing copyClaude Sonnet 51.00
21Discussion postDiscussion boardGPT-5.6 Luna1.00
22News articleNews articleGemini 3.5 Flash1.00
23Argumentative essayAcademic essayClaude Haiku 4.51.00
24Lit reviewAcademic essayGPT-5.6 Terra1.00
25Cover letterApplication essayGemini 2.5 Flash0.34
26Personal statementApplication essayClaude Sonnet 51.00
27How-to blogBlog postGPT-5.6 Luna0.79
28Listicle blogBlog postGemini 3.5 Flash0.91
29Business emailBusiness emailClaude Haiku 4.50.82
30Landing copyMarketing copyGPT-5.6 Terra1.00
31Product descriptionMarketing copyGemini 2.5 Flash1.00
32Discussion postDiscussion boardClaude Sonnet 51.00
33News articleNews articleGPT-5.6 Luna0.94
Detector rate (mean human-likelihood)55.1hardest89.192.284.588.486.457.6
Runs passed18/3330/3331/3330/3332/3330/3319/33

Each detector's result is converted to a human-likelihood score between 0 and 1. A score of 0 means the detector is sure the text is AI. A score of 1 means it is sure the text is human. Dots are green at 0.50 or above and red below. Hover a dot to see its exact score. The 0.50 cut-off only sets the dot colors. A tool's bypass rate on the leaderboard takes the median of the 7 detector scores for each test, then averages those medians. That gives a continuous number, so it will not match the share of green dots. The same goes for each per-detector rate. It is the average of that detector's scores (the number detector pages rank by), not a count of green dots.

Score history

Overall score in every published cycle that included this tool.

255075100

Access

Starting price
$9.99/mo
Free tier
Yes
Public API
Yes (required for inclusion)

Lowest paid plan at the monthly rate, without any annual discount. Price does not affect the score.

How we tested

The tool rewrote 33 texts from 7 writing categories on its default settings. Then 7 independent AI detectors scored each output. Anyone can recompute every score from the published data.

Raw test data

Every input text from the October 2026 cycle, with this tool's rewrite, the settings used and each detector's score.

GPTinf
33 rows · .jsonl

Compare with

Featured in

Embed this badge

Show GPTinf’s overall rank on your own site. The badge always uses the latest published cycle, so embedded copies update when the rank changes. Load the image from our URL and link it back to this page.

GPTinf rank badge preview