AI Humanizer Benchmark

Leaderboard / Compare / AI Humanize vs SuperHumanizer

Head to head · September 2026 cycle

AI Humanize vs SuperHumanizer

AI Humanize finished 7.6 points ahead of SuperHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 76.10 to 68.50, ranking #5 against #8 in a field of 11. AI Humanize scored higher on 5 of 7 detectors and 4 of 7 writing categories. SuperHumanizer came out ahead on Meaning preservation (77.3 vs 70.8), Consistency (72.8 vs 67.9), Originality.ai (50.8 vs 23.2). The bypass-rate gap, 70.7 to 82.6, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.

AI HumanizeLeads
aihumanize.io
76.10/100
Overall score
#5/11
Rank
+7.6
AI Humanize leads
Detectors
52
Categories
43
Components
32
SuperHumanizer
superhumanizer.ai
68.50/100
Overall score
#8/11
Rank
Last tested
2026-09-03
Prompts
33
Methodology
v1.0.0

Score components

What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works

AI HumanizeSuperHumanizer
Bypass rateCIs overlapAI Humanize by 11.9
82.6
70.7
Meaning preservationSuperHumanizer by 6.5
70.8
77.3
ReadabilityAI Humanize by 0.7
74.7
74.0
ConsistencySuperHumanizer by 4.8
67.9
72.8
Penaltiesfewer is betterAI Humanize by 5.0
None
−5.0

CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate; it may not survive another cycle.

Detector by detector

Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. AI Humanize took 5 of 7.

AI HumanizeSuperHumanizer
GPTZeroSuperHumanizer by 8.6
55.4
64.0
Winston AIAI Humanize by 28.8
81.0
52.3
Originality.aiSuperHumanizer by 27.6
23.2
50.8
ZeroGPTAI Humanize by 8.4
87.1
78.7
GrammarlyAI Humanize by 11.6
88.4
76.8
QuillBotAI Humanize by 14.7
89.3
74.6
CopyleaksAI Humanize by 15.3
66.7
51.4

Writing categories

Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row.

Academic essayApplication essayBlog postBusiness emailMarketing copyDiscussion boardNews article
AI HumanizeSuperHumanizerOuter ring = 100
AI HumanizeSuperHumanizer
Academic essay6 promptsAI Humanize by 0.7
83.1
82.4
Application essay6 promptsAI Humanize by 10.2
74.7
64.5
Blog post6 promptsAI Humanize by 11.6
79.7
68.1
Business email3 promptsSuperHumanizer by 15.6
41.5
57.1
Marketing copy6 promptsAI Humanize by 5.1
82.7
77.6
Discussion board3 promptsSuperHumanizer by 8.3
73.0
81.3
News article3 promptsSuperHumanizer by 3.3
82.2
85.5

Where each one wins

Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.

AI Humanize

12 wins
  • Bypass rate Score82.6 vs 70.7
  • Penalties ScoreNone vs −5.0
  • Readability Score74.7 vs 74.0
  • Winston AI Detector81.0 vs 52.3
  • Copyleaks Detector66.7 vs 51.4
  • QuillBot Detector89.3 vs 74.6
  • Grammarly Detector88.4 vs 76.8
  • ZeroGPT Detector87.1 vs 78.7
  • Blog post Category79.7 vs 68.1
  • Application essay Category74.7 vs 64.5
  • Marketing copy Category82.7 vs 77.6
  • Academic essay Category83.1 vs 82.4

SuperHumanizer

7 wins
  • Meaning preservation Score77.3 vs 70.8
  • Consistency Score72.8 vs 67.9
  • Originality.ai Detector50.8 vs 23.2
  • GPTZero Detector64.0 vs 55.4
  • Business email Category57.1 vs 41.5
  • Discussion board Category81.3 vs 73.0
  • News article Category85.5 vs 82.2

Questions people ask

Is AI Humanize better than SuperHumanizer?

AI Humanize finished 7.6 points ahead of SuperHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 76.10 to 68.50, ranking #5 against #8 in a field of 11. AI Humanize scored higher on 5 of 7 detectors and 4 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 7 detectors, under methodology v1.0.0; every input, output, and verdict is published.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, AI Humanize or SuperHumanizer?

AI Humanize posted the higher bypass rate, 82.6 vs 70.7, and scored higher on 5 of 7 detectors. AI Humanize led on Winston AI, ZeroGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot and Copyleaks; SuperHumanizer led on GPTZero and Originality.ai. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.

Do AI Humanize and SuperHumanizer keep the original meaning?

SuperHumanizer preserved meaning better, 77.3 vs 70.8 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, AI Humanize rated higher, 74.7 vs 74.0. Penalties this cycle: AI Humanize None, SuperHumanizer −5.0.

More matchups

Add a third tool to this comparison·Every matchup

Go deeper