AI Humanizer BenchmarkLeaderboard / Compare / AI Humanize vs SuperHumanizer
Head to head · October 2026 cycle
AI Humanize vs SuperHumanizer
On the October 2026 leaderboard, AI Humanize leads SuperHumanizer 78.33 to 78.23, a gap of 0.10 points. AI Humanize ranks #5 and SuperHumanizer ranks #6 out of 11 tools. AI Humanize scores higher on 5 of 7 detectors and in 3 of 7 writing categories. SuperHumanizer is ahead on meaning preservation (75.2 vs 66.4), GPTZero (47.6 vs 40.9) and Originality.ai (88.2 vs 85.5). On bypass rate, SuperHumanizer scores 83.9% and AI Humanize scores 89.5%, but their 95% confidence intervals overlap, so that difference is not statistically clear.
- Detectors
- 5 – 2
- Categories
- 3 – 4
- Components
- 3 – 1
- Last tested
- Prompts
- 33
- Methodology
- v1.1.0
Score components
The overall score weights bypass rate at 42%, meaning preservation at 32%, readability at 16% and consistency across writing categories at 10%. Penalties for output-quality failures are then subtracted. Full scoring formula
Overlapping CIs means the two tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate overlap, so the bypass difference is not statistically clear.
Detector by detector
Each figure is one detector's average human-likelihood score across all of a tool's outputs, on a 0–100 scale. Higher means more human. AI Humanize scores higher on 5 of 7 detectors.
Writing categories
Each category score applies the overall-score weights to that category's prompts only. Bypass, meaning preservation and readability are averaged within the category, and the tool's overall consistency score is added. Penalties are not subtracted. Categories with few prompts give less reliable scores, so each row shows its prompt count.
Where each one wins
Measures where one tool is ahead of the other. Ties are left out. Score components come first, then detectors, then categories, with the largest gap first in each group.
AI Humanize
11 wins- Bypass rate Score89.5 vs 83.9
- Consistency Score89.3 vs 85.6
- Readability Score72.1 vs 71.0
- Winston AI Detector86.5 vs 68.8
- Copyleaks Detector72.7 vs 63.6
- Grammarly Detector91.1 vs 83.5
- QuillBot Detector88.0 vs 81.3
- ZeroGPT Detector85.7 vs 83.5
- Business email Category77.2 vs 66.6
- Academic essay Category84.2 vs 82.6
- Blog post Category78.5 vs 76.9
SuperHumanizer
7 wins- Meaning preservation Score75.2 vs 66.4
- GPTZero Detector47.6 vs 40.9
- Originality.ai Detector88.2 vs 85.5
- News article Category85.3 vs 81.6
- Application essay Category76.8 vs 73.5
- Discussion board Category85.7 vs 83.1
- Marketing copy Category80.6 vs 79.2
Questions people ask
Is AI Humanize better than SuperHumanizer?
On the October 2026 leaderboard, AI Humanize has an overall score of 78.33 and SuperHumanizer has 78.23, a gap of 0.10 points. AI Humanize ranks #5 and SuperHumanizer ranks #6 out of 11 tools. AI Humanize scores higher on 5 of 7 detectors and in 3 of 7 writing categories. Both tools rewrote the same 33 prompts, the same 7 detectors checked every output, and scoring followed methodology v1.1.0. All inputs, outputs and detector verdicts are public.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, AI Humanize or SuperHumanizer?
AI Humanize has the higher bypass rate, 89.5% vs 83.9% for SuperHumanizer. AI Humanize scores higher on Winston AI, ZeroGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot and Copyleaks. SuperHumanizer scores higher on GPTZero and Originality.ai. The two tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate overlap, so the difference is not statistically clear.
Do AI Humanize and SuperHumanizer keep the original meaning?
Meaning preservation measures how close each output stays to its input, using embedding similarity on a 0–100 scale. SuperHumanizer scores 75.2 and AI Humanize scores 66.4. On readability, AI Humanize scores higher, 72.1 vs 71.0. This cycle, AI Humanize lost 1.0 points to penalties and SuperHumanizer lost 1.0 points to penalties.