AI Humanizer BenchmarkLeaderboard / Compare / CleverHumanizer vs SuperHumanizer
Head to head · September 2026 cycle
CleverHumanizer vs SuperHumanizer
SuperHumanizer finished 1.7 points ahead of CleverHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 68.50 to 66.80, ranking #8 against #9 in a field of 11. SuperHumanizer scored higher on 1 of 7 detectors and 3 of 7 writing categories. CleverHumanizer came out ahead on Consistency (88.8 vs 72.8), Bypass rate (86.5 vs 70.7), GPTZero (90.0 vs 64.0). The bypass-rate gap, 86.5 to 70.7, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.
- Detectors
- 6 – 1
- Categories
- 4 – 3
- Components
- 2 – 3
- Last tested
- 2026-09-03
- Prompts
- 33
- Methodology
- v1.0.0
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. CleverHumanizer took 6 of 7.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row.
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
CleverHumanizer
12 wins- Consistency Score88.8 vs 72.8
- Bypass rate Score86.5 vs 70.7
- GPTZero Detector90.0 vs 64.0
- Grammarly Detector96.9 vs 76.8
- Winston AI Detector70.5 vs 52.3
- Originality.ai Detector67.0 vs 50.8
- QuillBot Detector88.8 vs 74.6
- Copyleaks Detector53.2 vs 51.4
- Blog post Category81.5 vs 68.1
- Business email Category68.3 vs 57.1
- Application essay Category71.7 vs 64.5
- Marketing copy Category79.1 vs 77.6
SuperHumanizer
7 wins- Meaning preservation Score77.3 vs 65.3
- Penalties Score−5.0 vs −11.0
- Readability Score74.0 vs 73.2
- ZeroGPT Detector78.7 vs 77.9
- Discussion board Category81.3 vs 77.6
- News article Category85.5 vs 82.9
- Academic essay Category82.4 vs 81.4
Questions people ask
Is CleverHumanizer better than SuperHumanizer?
SuperHumanizer finished 1.7 points ahead of CleverHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 68.50 to 66.80, ranking #8 against #9 in a field of 11. SuperHumanizer scored higher on 1 of 7 detectors and 3 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 7 detectors, under methodology v1.0.0; every input, output, and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, CleverHumanizer or SuperHumanizer?
CleverHumanizer posted the higher bypass rate, 86.5 vs 70.7, and scored higher on 6 of 7 detectors. CleverHumanizer led on GPTZero, Winston AI, Originality.ai, Grammarly, QuillBot and Copyleaks; SuperHumanizer led on ZeroGPT. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.
Do CleverHumanizer and SuperHumanizer keep the original meaning?
SuperHumanizer preserved meaning better, 77.3 vs 65.3 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, SuperHumanizer rated higher, 74.0 vs 73.2. Penalties this cycle: CleverHumanizer −11.0, SuperHumanizer −5.0.