AI Humanizer BenchmarkLeaderboard / Compare / CleverHumanizer vs WriteHuman
Head to head · September 2026 cycle
CleverHumanizer vs WriteHuman
WriteHuman finished 14.8 points ahead of CleverHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 81.60 to 66.80, ranking #3 against #9 in a field of 11. WriteHuman scored higher on 4 of 7 detectors and 5 of 7 writing categories. CleverHumanizer came out ahead on Consistency (88.8 vs 86.4), Readability (73.2 vs 72.4), GPTZero (90.0 vs 56.5). The bypass-rate gap, 86.5 to 90.4, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.
- Detectors
- 3 – 4
- Categories
- 2 – 5
- Components
- 2 – 3
- Last tested
- 2026-09-03
- Prompts
- 33
- Methodology
- v1.0.0
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. WriteHuman took 4 of 7.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row.
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
CleverHumanizer
7 wins- Consistency Score88.8 vs 86.4
- Readability Score73.2 vs 72.4
- GPTZero Detector90.0 vs 56.5
- Originality.ai Detector67.0 vs 59.2
- Grammarly Detector96.9 vs 94.2
- News article Category82.9 vs 79.6
- Blog post Category81.5 vs 80.6
WriteHuman
12 wins- Meaning preservation Score76.2 vs 65.3
- Penalties Score−1.0 vs −11.0
- Bypass rate Score90.4 vs 86.5
- ZeroGPT Detector92.0 vs 77.9
- Winston AI Detector82.1 vs 70.5
- Copyleaks Detector63.6 vs 53.2
- QuillBot Detector92.2 vs 88.8
- Application essay Category84.9 vs 71.7
- Marketing copy Category86.2 vs 79.1
- Discussion board Category83.1 vs 77.6
- Academic essay Category86.2 vs 81.4
- Business email Category69.5 vs 68.3
Questions people ask
Is CleverHumanizer better than WriteHuman?
WriteHuman finished 14.8 points ahead of CleverHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 81.60 to 66.80, ranking #3 against #9 in a field of 11. WriteHuman scored higher on 4 of 7 detectors and 5 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 7 detectors, under methodology v1.0.0; every input, output, and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, CleverHumanizer or WriteHuman?
WriteHuman posted the higher bypass rate, 90.4 vs 86.5, and scored higher on 4 of 7 detectors. CleverHumanizer led on GPTZero, Originality.ai and Grammarly; WriteHuman led on Winston AI, ZeroGPT, QuillBot and Copyleaks. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.
Do CleverHumanizer and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?
WriteHuman preserved meaning better, 76.2 vs 65.3 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, CleverHumanizer rated higher, 73.2 vs 72.4. Penalties this cycle: CleverHumanizer −11.0, WriteHuman −1.0.