AI Humanizer BenchmarkLeaderboard / Compare / ReHumanize vs SuperHumanizer
Head to head · September 2026 cycle
ReHumanize vs SuperHumanizer
SuperHumanizer finished 29.5 points ahead of ReHumanize in the September 2026 cycle, 68.50 to 39.00, ranking #8 against #10 in a field of 11. SuperHumanizer scored higher on 7 of 7 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. ReHumanize came out ahead on Consistency (95.1 vs 72.8), Readability (81.4 vs 74.0), Penalties (−4.0 vs −5.0).
- Detectors
- 0 – 7
- Categories
- 0 – 7
- Components
- 3 – 2
- Last tested
- 2026-09-03
- Prompts
- 33
- Methodology
- v1.0.0
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. SuperHumanizer took 7 of 7.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row.
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
ReHumanize
3 wins- Consistency Score95.1 vs 72.8
- Readability Score81.4 vs 74.0
- Penalties Score−4.0 vs −5.0
SuperHumanizer
16 wins- Bypass rate Score70.7 vs 3.7
- Meaning preservation Score77.3 vs 59.2
- GPTZero Detector64.0 vs 5.7
- QuillBot Detector74.6 vs 21.9
- Winston AI Detector52.3 vs 0.0
- Originality.ai Detector50.8 vs 0.1
- Copyleaks Detector51.4 vs 3.0
- ZeroGPT Detector78.7 vs 32.6
- Grammarly Detector76.8 vs 64.2
- Academic essay Category82.4 vs 38.1
- Discussion board Category81.3 vs 38.9
- News article Category85.5 vs 43.4
- Marketing copy Category77.6 vs 44.6
- Application essay Category64.5 vs 42.0
- Blog post Category68.1 vs 47.2
- Business email Category57.1 vs 47.1
Questions people ask
Is ReHumanize better than SuperHumanizer?
SuperHumanizer finished 29.5 points ahead of ReHumanize in the September 2026 cycle, 68.50 to 39.00, ranking #8 against #10 in a field of 11. SuperHumanizer scored higher on 7 of 7 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 7 detectors, under methodology v1.0.0; every input, output, and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, ReHumanize or SuperHumanizer?
SuperHumanizer posted the higher bypass rate, 70.7 vs 3.7, and scored higher on 7 of 7 detectors. ReHumanize led on none; SuperHumanizer led on GPTZero, Winston AI, Originality.ai, ZeroGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot and Copyleaks. The gap holds outside both tools' 95% confidence intervals.
Do ReHumanize and SuperHumanizer keep the original meaning?
SuperHumanizer preserved meaning better, 77.3 vs 59.2 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, ReHumanize rated higher, 81.4 vs 74.0. Penalties this cycle: ReHumanize −4.0, SuperHumanizer −5.0.