AI Humanizer Benchmark

Leaderboard / Compare / ReHumanize vs SuperHumanizer

Head to head · October 2026 cycle

ReHumanize vs SuperHumanizer

On the October 2026 leaderboard, SuperHumanizer leads ReHumanize 78.23 to 41.60, a gap of 36.63 points. SuperHumanizer ranks #6 and ReHumanize ranks #10 out of 11 tools. SuperHumanizer scores higher on all 7 detectors and in all 7 writing categories. ReHumanize is ahead on readability (82.7 vs 71.0) and consistency (96.9 vs 85.6).

41.60/100
Overall score
#10/11
Rank
+36.63
SuperHumanizer leads
Detectors
0 – 7
Categories
0 – 7
Components
2 – 3
SuperHumanizerLeads
superhumanizer.ai ↗
78.23/100
Overall score
#6/11
Rank
Last tested
Prompts
33
Methodology
v1.1.0

Score components

The overall score weights bypass rate at 42%, meaning preservation at 32%, readability at 16% and consistency across writing categories at 10%. Penalties for output-quality failures are then subtracted. Full scoring formula

ReHumanizeSuperHumanizer
Bypass rateSuperHumanizer by 82.3
1.7
83.9
Meaning preservationSuperHumanizer by 6.5
68.7
75.2
ReadabilityReHumanize by 11.7
82.7
71.0
ConsistencyReHumanize by 11.3
96.9
85.6
Penaltieslower is betterSuperHumanizer by 3.0
−4.0
−1.0

Detector by detector

Each figure is one detector's average human-likelihood score across all of a tool's outputs, on a 0–100 scale. Higher means more human. SuperHumanizer scores higher on all 7 detectors.

ReHumanizeSuperHumanizer
GPTZeroSuperHumanizer by 47.6
0.0
47.6
Winston AISuperHumanizer by 68.8
0.0
68.8
Originality.aiSuperHumanizer by 88.2
0.0
88.2
ZeroGPTSuperHumanizer by 35.4
48.1
83.5
GrammarlySuperHumanizer by 33.3
50.2
83.5
QuillBotSuperHumanizer by 55.2
26.1
81.3
CopyleaksSuperHumanizer by 58.9
4.7
63.6

Writing categories

Each category score applies the overall-score weights to that category's prompts only. Bypass, meaning preservation and readability are averaged within the category, and the tool's overall consistency score is added. Penalties are not subtracted. Categories with few prompts give less reliable scores, so each row shows its prompt count.

Academic essayApplication essayBlog postBusiness emailMarketing copyDiscussion boardNews article
ReHumanizeSuperHumanizerScale: 0–100
ReHumanizeSuperHumanizer
Academic essay6 promptsSuperHumanizer by 40.5
42.1
82.6
Application essay6 promptsSuperHumanizer by 30.7
46.1
76.8
Blog post6 promptsSuperHumanizer by 28.3
48.6
76.9
Business email3 promptsSuperHumanizer by 18.7
47.9
66.6
Marketing copy6 promptsSuperHumanizer by 37.5
43.1
80.6
Discussion board3 promptsSuperHumanizer by 39.4
46.3
85.7
News article3 promptsSuperHumanizer by 37.8
47.5
85.3

Where each one wins

Measures where one tool is ahead of the other. Ties are left out. Score components come first, then detectors, then categories, with the largest gap first in each group.

ReHumanize

2 wins
  • Readability Score82.7 vs 71.0
  • Consistency Score96.9 vs 85.6

SuperHumanizer

17 wins
  • Bypass rate Score83.9 vs 1.7
  • Meaning preservation Score75.2 vs 68.7
  • Penalties Score−1.0 vs −4.0
  • Originality.ai Detector88.2 vs 0.0
  • Winston AI Detector68.8 vs 0.0
  • Copyleaks Detector63.6 vs 4.7
  • QuillBot Detector81.3 vs 26.1
  • GPTZero Detector47.6 vs 0.0
  • ZeroGPT Detector83.5 vs 48.1
  • Grammarly Detector83.5 vs 50.2
  • Academic essay Category82.6 vs 42.1
  • Discussion board Category85.7 vs 46.3
  • News article Category85.3 vs 47.5
  • Marketing copy Category80.6 vs 43.1
  • Application essay Category76.8 vs 46.1
  • Blog post Category76.9 vs 48.6
  • Business email Category66.6 vs 47.9

Questions people ask

Is ReHumanize better than SuperHumanizer?

On the October 2026 leaderboard, SuperHumanizer has an overall score of 78.23 and ReHumanize has 41.60, a gap of 36.63 points. SuperHumanizer ranks #6 and ReHumanize ranks #10 out of 11 tools. SuperHumanizer scores higher on all 7 detectors and in all 7 writing categories. Both tools rewrote the same 33 prompts, the same 7 detectors checked every output, and scoring followed methodology v1.1.0. All inputs, outputs and detector verdicts are public.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, ReHumanize or SuperHumanizer?

SuperHumanizer has the higher bypass rate, 83.9% vs 1.7% for ReHumanize. It scores higher on all 7 detectors. The two tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate do not overlap.

Do ReHumanize and SuperHumanizer keep the original meaning?

Meaning preservation measures how close each output stays to its input, using embedding similarity on a 0–100 scale. SuperHumanizer scores 75.2 and ReHumanize scores 68.7. On readability, ReHumanize scores higher, 82.7 vs 71.0. This cycle, ReHumanize lost 4.0 points to penalties and SuperHumanizer lost 1.0 points to penalties.

More matchups

Compare with a third tool·All head-to-head pages

Go deeper