AI Humanizer Benchmark

Leaderboard / Compare / SmartHumanizer vs Undetectable AI

Head to head · October 2026 cycle

SmartHumanizer vs Undetectable AI

On the October 2026 leaderboard, SmartHumanizer leads Undetectable AI 80.20 to 33.60, a gap of 46.60 points. SmartHumanizer ranks #4 and Undetectable AI ranks #11 out of 11 tools. SmartHumanizer scores higher on all 7 detectors and in all 7 writing categories. Undetectable AI is ahead on consistency (97.8 vs 84.3).

SmartHumanizerLeads
smarthumanizer.ai ↗
80.20/100
Overall score
#4/11
Rank
+46.60
SmartHumanizer leads
Detectors
7 – 0
Categories
7 – 0
Components
4 – 1
Undetectable AI
undetectable.ai ↗
33.60/100
Overall score
#11/11
Rank
Last tested
Prompts
33
Methodology
v1.1.0

Score components

The overall score weights bypass rate at 42%, meaning preservation at 32%, readability at 16% and consistency across writing categories at 10%. Penalties for output-quality failures are then subtracted. Full scoring formula

SmartHumanizerUndetectable AI
Bypass rateSmartHumanizer by 76.4
78.2
1.8
Meaning preservationSmartHumanizer by 10.0
82.9
72.9
ReadabilitySmartHumanizer by 4.2
77.5
73.2
ConsistencyUndetectable AI by 13.5
84.3
97.8
Penaltieslower is betterSmartHumanizer by 12.0
None
−12.0

Detector by detector

Each figure is one detector's average human-likelihood score across all of a tool's outputs, on a 0–100 scale. Higher means more human. SmartHumanizer scores higher on all 7 detectors.

SmartHumanizerUndetectable AI
GPTZeroSmartHumanizer by 16.3
28.3
12.0
Winston AISmartHumanizer by 57.0
60.0
3.0
Originality.aiSmartHumanizer by 79.1
82.9
3.8
ZeroGPTSmartHumanizer by 42.6
77.1
34.5
GrammarlySmartHumanizer by 61.0
81.6
20.6
QuillBotSmartHumanizer by 65.9
80.4
14.5
CopyleaksSmartHumanizer by 71.2
72.7
1.5

Writing categories

Each category score applies the overall-score weights to that category's prompts only. Bypass, meaning preservation and readability are averaged within the category, and the tool's overall consistency score is added. Penalties are not subtracted. Categories with few prompts give less reliable scores, so each row shows its prompt count.

Academic essayApplication essayBlog postBusiness emailMarketing copyDiscussion boardNews article
SmartHumanizerUndetectable AIScale: 0–100
SmartHumanizerUndetectable AI
Academic essay6 promptsSmartHumanizer by 48.0
87.6
39.6
Application essay6 promptsSmartHumanizer by 31.1
75.6
44.5
Blog post6 promptsSmartHumanizer by 19.2
72.2
53.0
Business email3 promptsSmartHumanizer by 25.5
74.5
49.0
Marketing copy6 promptsSmartHumanizer by 37.5
81.4
43.9
Discussion board3 promptsSmartHumanizer by 49.6
88.6
39.0
News article3 promptsSmartHumanizer by 33.7
85.4
51.7

Where each one wins

Measures where one tool is ahead of the other. Ties are left out. Score components come first, then detectors, then categories, with the largest gap first in each group.

SmartHumanizer

18 wins
  • Bypass rate Score78.2 vs 1.8
  • Penalties ScoreNone vs −12.0
  • Meaning preservation Score82.9 vs 72.9
  • Readability Score77.5 vs 73.2
  • Originality.ai Detector82.9 vs 3.8
  • Copyleaks Detector72.7 vs 1.5
  • QuillBot Detector80.4 vs 14.5
  • Grammarly Detector81.6 vs 20.6
  • Winston AI Detector60.0 vs 3.0
  • ZeroGPT Detector77.1 vs 34.5
  • GPTZero Detector28.3 vs 12.0
  • Discussion board Category88.6 vs 39.0
  • Academic essay Category87.6 vs 39.6
  • Marketing copy Category81.4 vs 43.9
  • News article Category85.4 vs 51.7
  • Application essay Category75.6 vs 44.5
  • Business email Category74.5 vs 49.0
  • Blog post Category72.2 vs 53.0

Undetectable AI

1 win
  • Consistency Score97.8 vs 84.3

Questions people ask

Is SmartHumanizer better than Undetectable AI?

On the October 2026 leaderboard, SmartHumanizer has an overall score of 80.20 and Undetectable AI has 33.60, a gap of 46.60 points. SmartHumanizer ranks #4 and Undetectable AI ranks #11 out of 11 tools. SmartHumanizer scores higher on all 7 detectors and in all 7 writing categories. Both tools rewrote the same 33 prompts, the same 7 detectors checked every output, and scoring followed methodology v1.1.0. All inputs, outputs and detector verdicts are public.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, SmartHumanizer or Undetectable AI?

SmartHumanizer has the higher bypass rate, 78.2% vs 1.8% for Undetectable AI. It scores higher on all 7 detectors. The two tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate do not overlap.

Do SmartHumanizer and Undetectable AI keep the original meaning?

Meaning preservation measures how close each output stays to its input, using embedding similarity on a 0–100 scale. SmartHumanizer scores 82.9 and Undetectable AI scores 72.9. On readability, SmartHumanizer scores higher, 77.5 vs 73.2. This cycle, SmartHumanizer had no penalties and Undetectable AI lost 12.0 points to penalties.

More matchups

Compare with a third tool·All head-to-head pages

Go deeper