AI Humanizer BenchmarkLeaderboard / Compare / SuperHumanizer vs WriteHuman
Head to head · September 2026 cycle
SuperHumanizer vs WriteHuman
WriteHuman finished 13.1 points ahead of SuperHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 81.60 to 68.50, ranking #3 against #8 in a field of 11. WriteHuman scored higher on 6 of 7 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. SuperHumanizer came out ahead on Readability (74.0 vs 72.4), Meaning preservation (77.3 vs 76.2), GPTZero (64.0 vs 56.5). The bypass-rate gap, 70.7 to 90.4, sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals, so treat bypass as a draw.
- Detectors
- 1 – 6
- Categories
- 1 – 6
- Components
- 2 – 3
- Last tested
- 2026-09-03
- Prompts
- 33
- Methodology
- v1.0.0
Score components
What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works
CIs overlap marks a gap that sits inside both tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate; it may not survive another cycle.
Detector by detector
Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. WriteHuman took 6 of 7.
Writing categories
Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row.
Where each one wins
Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.
SuperHumanizer
4 wins- Readability Score74.0 vs 72.4
- Meaning preservation Score77.3 vs 76.2
- GPTZero Detector64.0 vs 56.5
- News article Category85.5 vs 79.6
WriteHuman
15 wins- Bypass rate Score90.4 vs 70.7
- Consistency Score86.4 vs 72.8
- Penalties Score−1.0 vs −5.0
- Winston AI Detector82.1 vs 52.3
- QuillBot Detector92.2 vs 74.6
- Grammarly Detector94.2 vs 76.8
- ZeroGPT Detector92.0 vs 78.7
- Copyleaks Detector63.6 vs 51.4
- Originality.ai Detector59.2 vs 50.8
- Application essay Category84.9 vs 64.5
- Blog post Category80.6 vs 68.1
- Business email Category69.5 vs 57.1
- Marketing copy Category86.2 vs 77.6
- Academic essay Category86.2 vs 82.4
- Discussion board Category83.1 vs 81.3
Questions people ask
Is SuperHumanizer better than WriteHuman?
WriteHuman finished 13.1 points ahead of SuperHumanizer in the September 2026 cycle, 81.60 to 68.50, ranking #3 against #8 in a field of 11. WriteHuman scored higher on 6 of 7 detectors and 6 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 7 detectors, under methodology v1.0.0; every input, output, and verdict is published.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, SuperHumanizer or WriteHuman?
WriteHuman posted the higher bypass rate, 90.4 vs 70.7, and scored higher on 6 of 7 detectors. SuperHumanizer led on GPTZero; WriteHuman led on Winston AI, Originality.ai, ZeroGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot and Copyleaks. The overall bypass gap is inside both 95% confidence intervals, so it is not a reliable difference.
Do SuperHumanizer and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?
SuperHumanizer preserved meaning better, 77.3 vs 76.2 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, SuperHumanizer rated higher, 74.0 vs 72.4. Penalties this cycle: SuperHumanizer −5.0, WriteHuman −1.0.