AI Humanizer BenchmarkLeaderboard / Compare / SuperHumanizer vs WriteHuman
Head to head · October 2026 cycle
SuperHumanizer vs WriteHuman
On the October 2026 leaderboard, SuperHumanizer leads WriteHuman 78.23 to 75.06, a gap of 3.17 points. SuperHumanizer ranks #6 and WriteHuman ranks #7 out of 11 tools. SuperHumanizer scores higher on none of the 7 detectors and in 4 of 7 writing categories. WriteHuman is ahead on bypass rate (97.6% vs 83.9%), consistency (96.0 vs 85.6) and readability (71.4 vs 71.0).
- Detectors
- 0 – 7
- Categories
- 4 – 3
- Components
- 2 – 3
- Last tested
- Prompts
- 33
- Methodology
- v1.1.0
Score components
The overall score weights bypass rate at 42%, meaning preservation at 32%, readability at 16% and consistency across writing categories at 10%. Penalties for output-quality failures are then subtracted. Full scoring formula
Detector by detector
Each figure is one detector's average human-likelihood score across all of a tool's outputs, on a 0–100 scale. Higher means more human. WriteHuman scores higher on all 7 detectors.
Writing categories
Each category score applies the overall-score weights to that category's prompts only. Bypass, meaning preservation and readability are averaged within the category, and the tool's overall consistency score is added. Penalties are not subtracted. Categories with few prompts give less reliable scores, so each row shows its prompt count.
Where each one wins
Measures where one tool is ahead of the other. Ties are left out. Score components come first, then detectors, then categories, with the largest gap first in each group.
SuperHumanizer
6 wins- Meaning preservation Score75.2 vs 53.2
- Penalties Score−1.0 vs −4.0
- Discussion board Category85.7 vs 81.3
- Marketing copy Category80.6 vs 77.7
- News article Category85.3 vs 82.8
- Academic essay Category82.6 vs 81.1
WriteHuman
13 wins- Bypass rate Score97.6 vs 83.9
- Consistency Score96.0 vs 85.6
- Readability Score71.4 vs 71.0
- GPTZero Detector100.0 vs 47.6
- Copyleaks Detector93.9 vs 63.6
- Winston AI Detector94.8 vs 68.8
- Grammarly Detector95.9 vs 83.5
- Originality.ai Detector99.8 vs 88.2
- QuillBot Detector92.5 vs 81.3
- ZeroGPT Detector92.7 vs 83.5
- Business email Category73.9 vs 66.6
- Application essay Category79.8 vs 76.8
- Blog post Category77.2 vs 76.9
Questions people ask
Is SuperHumanizer better than WriteHuman?
On the October 2026 leaderboard, SuperHumanizer has an overall score of 78.23 and WriteHuman has 75.06, a gap of 3.17 points. SuperHumanizer ranks #6 and WriteHuman ranks #7 out of 11 tools. SuperHumanizer scores higher on none of the 7 detectors and in 4 of 7 writing categories. Both tools rewrote the same 33 prompts, the same 7 detectors checked every output, and scoring followed methodology v1.1.0. All inputs, outputs and detector verdicts are public.
Which bypasses AI detectors better, SuperHumanizer or WriteHuman?
WriteHuman has the higher bypass rate, 97.6% vs 83.9% for SuperHumanizer. It scores higher on all 7 detectors. The two tools' 95% confidence intervals for bypass rate do not overlap.
Do SuperHumanizer and WriteHuman keep the original meaning?
Meaning preservation measures how close each output stays to its input, using embedding similarity on a 0–100 scale. SuperHumanizer scores 75.2 and WriteHuman scores 53.2. On readability, WriteHuman scores higher, 71.4 vs 71.0. This cycle, SuperHumanizer lost 1.0 points to penalties and WriteHuman lost 4.0 points to penalties.