AI Humanizer Benchmark

Leaderboard / Compare / GPTinf vs ReHumanize

Head to head · September 2026 cycle

GPTinf vs ReHumanize

GPTinf finished 39.3 points ahead of ReHumanize in the September 2026 cycle, 78.30 to 39.00, ranking #4 against #10 in a field of 11. GPTinf scored higher on 7 of 7 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. ReHumanize came out ahead on Consistency (95.1 vs 82.2), Readability (81.4 vs 76.7).

GPTinfLeads
gptinf.com
78.30/100
Overall score
#4/11
Rank
+39.3
GPTinf leads
Detectors
70
Categories
70
Components
32
39.00/100
Overall score
#10/11
Rank
Last tested
2026-09-03
Prompts
33
Methodology
v1.0.0

Score components

What the overall score is made of: bypass rate weighs 42%, meaning preservation 32%, readability 16%, consistency across categories 10%. Output-quality penalties come off the total. How scoring works

GPTinfReHumanize
Bypass rateGPTinf by 76.2
79.9
3.7
Meaning preservationGPTinf by 16.5
75.7
59.2
ReadabilityReHumanize by 4.7
76.7
81.4
ConsistencyReHumanize by 12.9
82.2
95.1
Penaltiesfewer is betterGPTinf by 4.0
None
−4.0

Detector by detector

Share of each tool's outputs that a detector classified as human-written. GPTinf took 7 of 7.

GPTinfReHumanize
GPTZeroGPTinf by 64.1
69.8
5.7
Winston AIGPTinf by 63.0
63.0
0.0
Originality.aiGPTinf by 33.7
33.8
0.1
ZeroGPTGPTinf by 52.6
85.2
32.6
GrammarlyGPTinf by 23.4
87.6
64.2
QuillBotGPTinf by 63.0
84.9
21.9
CopyleaksGPTinf by 54.5
57.6
3.0

Writing categories

Category score per writing context: bypass credit only for real rewrites, blended with the category's own meaning preservation and readability. Small categories swing; the prompt count is shown on each row.

Academic essayApplication essayBlog postBusiness emailMarketing copyDiscussion boardNews article
GPTinfReHumanizeOuter ring = 100
GPTinfReHumanize
Academic essay6 promptsGPTinf by 47.2
85.3
38.1
Application essay6 promptsGPTinf by 37.5
79.5
42.0
Blog post6 promptsGPTinf by 27.8
75.0
47.2
Business email3 promptsGPTinf by 14.7
61.8
47.1
Marketing copy6 promptsGPTinf by 37.1
81.7
44.6
Discussion board3 promptsGPTinf by 44.0
82.9
38.9
News article3 promptsGPTinf by 29.8
73.2
43.4

Where each one wins

Every measure above that one tool won outright, largest margin first within each group.

GPTinf

17 wins
  • Bypass rate Score79.9 vs 3.7
  • Meaning preservation Score75.7 vs 59.2
  • Penalties ScoreNone vs −4.0
  • GPTZero Detector69.8 vs 5.7
  • QuillBot Detector84.9 vs 21.9
  • Winston AI Detector63.0 vs 0.0
  • Copyleaks Detector57.6 vs 3.0
  • ZeroGPT Detector85.2 vs 32.6
  • Originality.ai Detector33.8 vs 0.1
  • Grammarly Detector87.6 vs 64.2
  • Academic essay Category85.3 vs 38.1
  • Discussion board Category82.9 vs 38.9
  • Application essay Category79.5 vs 42.0
  • Marketing copy Category81.7 vs 44.6
  • News article Category73.2 vs 43.4
  • Blog post Category75.0 vs 47.2
  • Business email Category61.8 vs 47.1

ReHumanize

2 wins
  • Consistency Score95.1 vs 82.2
  • Readability Score81.4 vs 76.7

Questions people ask

Is GPTinf better than ReHumanize?

GPTinf finished 39.3 points ahead of ReHumanize in the September 2026 cycle, 78.30 to 39.00, ranking #4 against #10 in a field of 11. GPTinf scored higher on 7 of 7 detectors and 7 of 7 writing categories. Both tools ran the same 33 prompts, scored by the same 7 detectors, under methodology v1.0.0; every input, output, and verdict is published.

Which bypasses AI detectors better, GPTinf or ReHumanize?

GPTinf posted the higher bypass rate, 79.9 vs 3.7, and scored higher on 7 of 7 detectors. GPTinf led on GPTZero, Winston AI, Originality.ai, ZeroGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot and Copyleaks; ReHumanize led on none. The gap holds outside both tools' 95% confidence intervals.

Do GPTinf and ReHumanize keep the original meaning?

GPTinf preserved meaning better, 75.7 vs 59.2 on our 0–100 similarity scale. On readability, ReHumanize rated higher, 81.4 vs 76.7. Penalties this cycle: GPTinf None, ReHumanize −4.0.

More matchups

Add a third tool to this comparison·Every matchup

Go deeper