Leaderboard / Compare
Compare AI humanizers
Select two to four AI humanizers to see their bypass rate, meaning preservation and readability in one table, or open any pair from the grid below. All figures on this page come from the October 2026 run. Every tool got the same prompts and was judged by the same detectors and scoring code. All of the data is public.
Pick 2 to 4 tools 3 of 4 selected
| Overall | |||
| Leaderboard rank | #1 | #2 | #3 |
| Overall score | 88.12 | 83.87 | 80.74 |
| Score componentsOverall score weights: 42% bypass, 32% meaning, 16% readability, 10% consistency. Penalty points are then subtracted. | |||
| Bypass rate95% confidence interval shown below each value | 96.093.4–98.6 | 93.588.6–98.3 | 88.782.2–95.1 |
| Meaning preservation | 77.4 | 77.9 | 68.3 |
| Readability | 83.6 | 64.3 | 77.7 |
| Consistency across categories | 96.6 | 93.9 | 92.1 |
| Penalties | None | None | None |
| Detector bypass ratesAverage human-likelihood (0–100) each detector gave this tool's outputs. | |||
| GPTZero | 72.0 | 4.0 | 55.1 |
| Winston AI | 84.4 | 86.6 | 89.1 |
| Originality.ai | 96.7 | 89.1 | 92.2 |
| ZeroGPT | 92.3 | 94.7 | 84.5 |
| Grammarly | 96.8 | 88.9 | 88.4 |
| QuillBot | 91.0 | 93.4 | 86.4 |
| Copyleaks | 78.8 | 81.8 | 57.6 |
| Writing categoriesBypass, meaning preservation and readability on that category's prompts, weighted as in the overall score, plus the tool's overall consistency score. Penalties are not subtracted. | |||
| Academic essay6 prompts | 90.5 | 86.4 | 81.9 |
| Application essay6 prompts | 88.1 | 80.2 | 79.7 |
| Blog post6 prompts | 87.9 | 83.0 | 77.6 |
| Business email3 prompts | 84.3 | 79.8 | 79.2 |
| Marketing copy6 prompts | 84.0 | 84.1 | 81.1 |
| Discussion board3 prompts | 91.7 | 89.0 | 84.0 |
| News article3 prompts | 92.4 | 86.4 | 84.1 |
| AccessWhether the tool has a free tier. Every tool is tested on its default settings. | |||
| Free tier | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Every matchup
Each cell shows how many points the row tool scores above (green) or below (red) the column tool in the October 2026 cycle. Select a cell to open the full comparison of the two. In the W–L column, W is the number of other tools that tool outscores and L is the rest.
55 pairs · 11 tools
Closest calls
Smallest overall gaps this cycle.
The podium
The top three against each other.
Widest gaps
The most lopsided pairs in the field.
The ranking is rebuilt each cycle from the published input texts, rewrites and detector results. The latest run was on October 1, 2026. How scoring works